10 Comments

  1. Nice, only drawback is that the logo cannot be resized any much smaller or the “ang” will be unreadable. Which for a logo can be quite crucial as the design always has to be thoughtful of future considerations. i.e having to be reproduced in a small ad size. Another small point to note is that the position of the fork takes up quite a lot of vertical space so it can be a little disruptive to the visual balance. Just my two cents. :)

  2. I like how the ‘g’ is treated — as a graphic element it works very well (though not in the way you’d explained, pasta and all… to me, it anchors the the logo and provides a striking contrast).

    Not so wild about the fork though — it sticks out for some reason. maybe it’s got to do with the look and feel of the entire design; the addition of a fork just seems unneccessary (i’m a firm believer in Occam’s Razor). Two focal points (fork and gee) might be a bit much for a namecard this size. Or maybe it’s just the angle the fork is at. Either ways, that’s why i dig the front of the namecard more than the back.

    Spot lami the ‘G’!

  3. eep. i think my comment earlier went poof!

  4. pee, I think I might kill the fork and make the G shin-ee. Let’s see what Judy says…

  5. Winnie,

    You’re right about the “ang” being unreadable. That’s why I make a living being a Suit instead! Haha. Thanks for the highlight, now I have to figure out what’s the minimum size my logo can afford to be.

    I agree that the fork takes up a lot of vertical space and therefore will result in the logo looking like its ‘floating’. I have the intention on using the secondary logo, which is the “ang” and G letter as reflected on the front of the name card.

    Oh well, we’ll see what my aunt says and I’ll tweak accordingly. Thanks heaps for your comments.

  6. Just a thought – would be it be corny to add a tagline that say “Abso-forking-lutely delicious”?

    I think so. Heh. I’m so bloody corny it amazes me even. Now you know what I put my creatives through.

  7. I like the colors…

  8. eh… why am i crossing my fingers in relief that you ain’t my suit?

    anyhoo, i love the abso-forking-lutely delicious strap, but in this case, does it really reflect your brand personality?

    save it for your own bistro or sumthin’! (don’t you just love the dastardly business of recycling concepts? -snigger)

  9. another thought (re: winnie’s comment). since ‘g’ appears in the words ‘ang’ and ‘mcguire’, you could explore ways of merging them together typographically.

  10. pee, you’d never know, I might be your Suit someday. I hope your insurance covers you against Patophobia.

    Yeah, maybe I can combine the G… Hmmm.


Post a Comment

*
*